Novos has no person certifying Gnox

Gnox scam seems big, with many people involved indirectly. No one with stakes is willing to speak out. Advertisements have methodically been rebutted, one by one, each costs thousands of dollars. Online media sites depend on scams to generate cash flow.

Ethereum and Cardano are led by such celebrities as Vitalik Buterin and Charles Hoskinson. Accountability can promptly be transferred. No one has yet been informed on the identity or academic, technological and moral qualifications of Vanessa at Gnox.

Tokens don't trade in strict tandem. While mirroring bitcoin's fate, some become household names, while others are dismissed as scams and lose an excess of 99% of their value. Tokens launched at pancakeswap, such as gnox, require guaranteed extreme rewards.

A case may be made for gnox launch at pancakeswap to become investors' last chance to break even or book a small loss. Several years could ellapse, with gnox token equilibrium price close to zero, as credibility scandals and controversies continue to arise.

Less risky profits can be made investing elsewhere. Two or three months of deposits locked at gnox have opportunity cost of not staking something safer. Binance offers 55% to 70% annual returns on BNB and AXS: as close to safe haven as you could get.

Eventually consumers will back away from doing business with hidden entities. Indeed, consumers already disclose our identity for everything. Our lives are on the cloud. Accountability is required for gnox claiming to be worthy custodian of your funds.

Independent audits do not tolerate that consumers already spent our money and hold no tokens. We are shown instead a promise of airdrop payment on gnox dashboard.

There is no certainty that gnox tokens will ever be transacted through pancakeswap. There is no proof from pancakeswap, they claim there is currently no liquidity available from gnox.

Shouldn't investors funds, converted into gnox tokens, be locked in pacakeswap during 1 year at liquidity pool? Gnox team has already collected most customer presale funds.

What guarantee do investors have that their funds will become available for withdrawal? Gnox has already spent a lot of money in advertising and there might not be much equity left.

Gnox investment is today a disaster. A few weeks ago a token was worth 0.00000084 bitcoin. It has now decreased to 0.00000069 bitcoin. That is 18% depreciation. No moon at all.

I did not expect Soken to act so quickly and conclusively in revoking KYC for gnox. They might soon share further details of additional risks, still undisclosed to unwary investors.

Soken KYC was withdrawn because gnox team was uncooperative with security requests. Novos KYC site is just three weeks old, its California address leads nowhere, its domain data points to Russia. Novos does not have a person behind it to address consumer complaints.

Investors should refrain from linking hot wallets, which already contain other coins, with gnox site. Other coins should be transferred to another wallet. Soken warns gnox smart contracts contain owner privileged functionality that increase risk of fraudulent activity.

Advertising industry shall also be accountable for promoting scams such as gnox. Thorough investigations are overdue against every single website publication misleading consumers into faulty investments. Fake news media scammers shall be prosecuted, along with gnox.

If pancakeswap refrains from listing gnox on their site, what path is available for current gnox investors to recover funds? Which authorities should be warned about this case? Previous crypto scams resulted in some compensation after extensive litigation.

Investors deposited assets to wallets of Gnox Team in exchange of gnox tokens that haven't been released. Will gnox be available on pancakeswap on August 18? No liquidity is shown on their side. Has pancakeswap approved gnox application to list token there?

Money laundering rumors are added to financial and technological inconsistencies, which are the subject of internatiomal law enforcement investigations on gnox behavior. Novos remains unreachable through its fake California address and lack of email or phone contacts.

Soken Team recently disclaimed their formerly positive audit. Overwhelming recent evidence from gnox demands further investigation. More stringent know your customer requirements are overdue. Defi must get rid of widespread crime to become globally viable.

As criminal suspicions unfold, investors seeking fabulous returns are urged to reexamine their ethical values. Is it worth increasing one's equity at the expense of widespread social calamity? Why do we continue tolerating secrecy for owners of sites such as gnox?

Meanwhile, the business of recruiting followers into the gnox cult seeks to urgently replace investors who dared questioning too much. It is premature to assess the damage directly inflicted to investors, and indirectly suffered by broader crypto community.

"A smart contract audit is not financial advice. Always DYOR. During the audit of @gnox_io, the owner-privileged functionality was detected within the contract. At that point, the contract behaviour completely depends on the intentions of the owner.

Also, project owners did not use the audited contracts during the presale and we warn investors to double-check the correctness of the contract address before investing. Please, avoid investing in high-risk projects." (Soken Team, August 2nd, 2022)