Is @RoccoX12 Eric or Vanessa at Gnox?

I got my gnox airdrop. Sold into bnb and busd. Bought liquidity farms at pancake. After an hour farm liquidity was unlawfully removed. I lost not only what I received back from gnox but I lost previous liquidity farming. Everything in red is liquidity not removed by me.

Pancakeswap official telegram customer service tells me that receiving gnox airdrops is likely causing to get my wallet compromised. I have never shared password or seed phrase. My wallet always worked fine. If you sell gnox, transfer to another wallet immediately.

Auditors at both Soken and Solidproof warned that there were issues in code that could remove users' funds. Pancakeswap claims that they accept liquidity from anyone for any token, but gnox was able to remove assets not in my wallet, but in pancake liquidity pools.

Gnox is a scam. Everyone knows it by now. Launch was a disaster. Decentralized finance is failing in attracting new customers as there are plenty of stories or extinguished funds. It is a must to KYC gnox as I suspect they are acting against the law and must be accountable.

Pancakeswap telegram support notifies that airdrops that arrive into your wallet should not be used. Therefore even though they provide swapping services, they do not advise users to trade gnox token on their swap platform as it may cause loss of funds.

Pancakeswap forbids use of airdrops to be swapped on their platform. Ask their customer service. Pancakeswap instructs customers not to touch any airdrops as funds may be lost. All my previous pancakeswap liquidity farms are gone. Metamask wallet is compromised.

I received my airdrop from gnox. I swapped into bnb and busd. I deposited into my existing pancakeswap liquidity farms. I went out for a short errand. Upon return I had trouble connecting into pancakeswap. A few minutes later all my farms were gone.

Based on Soken & Solidproof audits which expressed security concerns, I highly suspect gnox tokens received had some programming that enabled malware to compromise my metamask wallet. It is significant that Gnox always recommended metamask instead of other wallets.

Why do auditing companies certify gnox if it does not renounce ownership? That is just posted as negative. How can a community review a token suspected of malware? How can we verify that remediations suggested by Sokenproof eliminate vulnerability risks?

Criminal issue developing today has three institutions accountable: Gnox, Metamask, Pancakeswap. The combined use of products from these companies is the key for today's scam. Soken and Solidproof have gathered enough evidence to disclose privileged info.

Seems that gnox is a master in breaching security. Both Soken and Solidproof expressed concerned about it. Programming code for reflection follows tokens everywhere as they move through the blockchain, potentially installing malware all over the internet.

I hereby certify that following transactions were not made by me, that i have never shared password and seed phrase, and that my assets were removed shortly after receiving gnox airdrop. Today's launch is a criminal activity and must be prosecuted.

Gnox holders planning to sell are advised to quickly remove all other assets remaining on Metamask and transfer them to another wallet. By approving gnox token for trade at pancakeswap router, mysterious coding might start functioning as malware by design.

By approving gnox token for trade on pancakeswap router, the holder is supposed to concede absolute agreement and faith with code, built in smart contract and held in Metamask. Perhaps changes presented for Solidproof audit were minor while major threats remain.

Pancakeswap denial of responsibility for mishandling gnox token becomes suspicious. They accept any new token that provides liquidity, while at they dismiss queries from whoever trades such token: they assume it already holds malicious code.

Gnox and Pancakeswap share identical fearful reactions towards fee-paying customers who ask abundant questions. Immediate warnings on community bannings, premature closing of unsolved tickets guarantees red flag. They seem eager to hide something big.

Pancakeswap website shows cartoon avatars for chefs rather than executive officers. It now seems that the hassle for requesting KYC (know your customer) is just for Gnox. Which is the team responsible for escalating cases? Where are they physically located?

Having no choice of trading gnox in any place other than pancakeswap, is something that has been on their plan from day one. Swapping custom token at an unsupportive platform is central to current investigation from Soken, revoking kyc and disclaiming audit from June.

In the dark web, it was suggested Gnox would physically harm anyone who would sell. People entrusted their hard earned money to RoccoX12 who fears displaying his eyes, even in an avatar. He won't reply to messages either.

RoccoX12 constantly expels investors out of Gnox telegram and discord groups whenever a heated discussion arises. Widespread belief that kyc on him is insufficient bodes poorly on his unverifiable work experience.

RoccoX12 has no verifiable team to satisfy either Soken or Solidproof on KYC for Gnox. Both auditors highlight setback that smart contract ownership is unrenounced. Community is denied access to code verifications or improvements.

Babymusk rugpull on Pancakeswap earlier this year was made by flagged address. Rugpulls are transitioning to a pool of coins offering liquidity farms. Hack on my funds, by same flagged address, included proceeds I made by selling Gnox.

Both Gnox and Pancakeswap seem to be involved, there are always major issues on launch days. My rugpulled investment was all this year's savings. We are dealing with cybercriminals. Neither RoccoX nor ChefSnowball abide by law.

Why would anyone hold investment from companies that are not transparent and whose owners are unknown? Why do they fail to insure customers' funds due as their security is faulty? They are interested in perpetuating scams forever.

Pancakeswap investments are attached to wallets that, contrary to popular belief, are highly insecure and get often compromised. Passwords and seed phrases are routinely retrieved by hackers. General public is scammed.

ChefSnowball remains liable for poor performance of Pancakeswap Router security during Babymusk rugpull. He failed to flag a delinquent wallet address that now chooses to deplete my funds, immediately after I swapped my Gnox.

Metamask wallets have a greater percentage of hacking than other vendors. Social media is abundant on fake Metamask recovery scam experts. Binance Chain consistently generates news of scam token launches. Not bullish.

Gnox Chat Moderators, per instructions from RoccoX12 highly recommend newcomers to install Metamask rather than more secure wallets. Had I chosen another wallet, it would have been harder to lose investment by hacking.

RoccoX12 had two months to investigate my wallet, along with my contact email and phone number. It was easy to coordinate with any Pancakeswap Chef to monitor transactions I made after I sold Gnox. All within minutes.

Expert decentralized finance users are accustomed to secure wallets, but the bulk of Gnox investors installed Metamask and may watch their funds disappear at any time. We must take conscious steps to stop mafia from stealing our money.

Hacker address that depleted both Babymusk and then me, was reported as a fraudulent address 4 months ago. Why is it still active? Why does nobody at Pancakeswap or Binance Chain support investigating recurring fraud? Are we afraid?

Mafia must be summoned to return my money back. Any company displaying avatars in lieu of professional profiles of their leadership, are in the business of hiding money laundering crimes. Do not let them continue scamming the world.

There is no way Gnox or Pancakeswap would increase reputation until security, compliance and identification issues are solved to the satisfaction of generally accepted accounting and legal principles. Blocking customers who complain won't help.

Fud is valid: Fear of mafia, Uncertainty of recovering funds, Dellusion of fake marketing. Crypto consumers are unprotected. Scams are routinely reported and nobody solves anything. This time there will be legal consequences.

Pancakeswap declines responsibility in scams because, according to them, people should never swap airdrop tokens. Their business model relies on customers swapping anything in their platform for gas fees. They need scam for profit.

Recurring rugpull are big case, involving various crypto ecosystems. Most of them refuse to cooperate on the excuse of privacy. It should be unacceptable for this planet to continue letting mafia run away from accountability. Scam victims deserve justice.

Gnox aggregator seeks contagion from pancakeswap scams and rugpulls at binance chain, ethereum, polygon and cronos, into avalanche, velas and newer blockchains. Excessive privacy entails delinquency through lack of transparency.

Scammed users worldwide have nowhere to appeal. Crypto companies thrive on promoting fraud. An abundance of fake coins raises profitability of genuine coins while ensuring fresh daily inflows from stolen funds to increase certain treasuries.

Crypto adoption should peak next year if scams are not aggressively prosecuted by international legal enforcement organizations. People will run away from widespread fraud into safe stores of value. Holding your keys means nothing if you get hacked.

Bitcoin is too expensive, slow and environmentally unfriendly. Ethereum fees will not decrease. Binance chain is cluttered with scam transactions no one dares to investigate. All kinds of unsellable airdrop tokens threaten otherwise safe wallets.

Thousands of freshly minted cryptocurrencies increase the total industry supply cap. Scams transfer earnings from world's people into criminal hands. Litigation for funds recovery takes years. Bear market seems ripe to flush out madness.